DSMN SVARGA database - User contributions [en]

MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T08:55:56Z

Max9003:

For territories such as markets, farmer's squares and fairs a separate autonomy will be responsible, which is as close to them as possible or on the territory of which these structures are located. The autonomy does not have an own management in the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, but it can recommend the owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs to do thus and so.

The owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, in turn, can completely ignore all the recommendations from executives of autonomy, but they must clearly understand that if the people of the autonomy responsible for their structures complain to their [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES|third-order executive (Judge)]], so third-order executive (Judge) can simply close these markets, farmer's squares and fairs and remove them from the territory.

Also, in addition to the autonomy that is directly responsible for markets, farmer's squares and fairs, these structures can also be closed by the three closest autonomies to these structures and also by complaints from residents of these autonomies.

Main Page

2025-01-30T08:53:47Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]

MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T08:52:50Z

Max9003: Created page with "For territories such as markets, farmer's squares and fairs a separate autonomy will be responsible, which is as close to them as possible or on the territory of which these structures are located. The autonomy does not have an own management in the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, but it can recommend the owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs to do thus and so. The owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, in turn, can completely ignore all the..."

For territories such as markets, farmer's squares and fairs a separate autonomy will be responsible, which is as close to them as possible or on the territory of which these structures are located. The autonomy does not have an own management in the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, but it can recommend the owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs to do thus and so.

The owners of the markets, farmer's squares and fairs, in turn, can completely ignore all the recommendations from executives of autonomy, but they must clearly understand that if the people of the autonomy responsible for their structures complain to their third-order executive (Judge), so third-order executive (Judge) can simply close these markets, farmer's squares and fairs and remove them from the territory.

Also, in addition to the autonomy that is directly responsible for markets, farmer's squares and fairs, these structures can also be closed by the three closest autonomies to these structures and also by complaints from residents of these autonomies.

Main Page

2025-01-30T07:39:33Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:38:55Z

Max9003: Created page with "All executives in the civil service have two days off a week, as well as some holidays (all as usual, but on condition that everything in their territory functions perfectly, if not, then there are no days off). Also they have a paid leave. When an executive is unable to perform his duties (for example on sick leave), another executive of the same territory, for example, an autonomy, a larger urban area, and so on, can take over his duties. The state will pay double sa..."

All executives in the civil service have two days off a week, as well as some holidays (all as usual, but on condition that everything in their territory functions perfectly, if not, then there are no days off). Also they have a paid leave.

When an executive is unable to perform his duties (for example on sick leave), another executive of the same territory, for example, an autonomy, a larger urban area, and so on, can take over his duties. The state will pay double salaries to such executives while they perform other executive's duties.

Even if several executives of the same order cannot temporarily perform their duties on one of their territories at the same time (this can simply happen), then volunteers can be recruited. Again, they must reside in the territory where such an executive is required. Such volunteers will also be paid the salary of an executive until this executive returns to the service.

The only exceptions to the group of executives above are second-order executives (Prosecutors) and third-order executives (Judges) of autonomies. Deputies and no one else will be strictly provided for them in advance - these will be also volunteers who, if necessary, will take their position temporarily. And yes, their efforts will also be paid in the amount of the salary of the relevant executive, whose place they temporarily occupy.

When an executive goes on vacation, he is replaced by a deputy, who can be either another executive of the same territory entrusted to him, or a volunteer living in that territory.

If, for some reason, the residents of the territory are not satisfied with the executive's deputies, these deputies are replaced by standard voting procedures designed to replace an executive of the appropriate rank.

All cases of replacement (including in cases of emergency and ordinary vacations) are discussed in advance and formalized. The number of deputies of any executives should always be at least two people. Executives retire at the age of 40.

Main Page

2025-01-30T07:30:50Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:29:50Z

Max9003:

Entrepreneurs, from the quotas provided to them for the region (the number of quotas is determined separately for each region), choose for themselves individual judges who deal only with economic cases.

If an entrepreneur needs to resolve a controversion with another entrepreneur, then he sues such a judge (any free one he wants), if it seems to him that the judge is biased, then he can take the case again with the help of any other judge dealing with economic controversions.

==Anti-corruption protection==

If an entrepreneur believes that all judges who deal with economic cases have been bought by some big business that always resolves controversions in its favor, and other entrepreneurs do not want to change these biased judges - these judges can be bought or intimidated, it does not matter. Then there is an opportunity to appeal in a special way to third-order executives (civil Judges) of four autonomies, one of them is necessarily the one where the entrepreneur himself is registered, and the other three are the nearest autonomies.

Judges of such autonomies will organize random juries who will consider the case of such an entrepreneur together. And if such a court comes to the conclusion that the entrepreneur is right and those judges who deal with economic cases to whom he appealed, passed an unfair verdict in his case, then such judges will be dismissed with disgrace and will be blacklisted regarding all possible posts and also entered into a special database where people who were dismissed in connection with the loss of trust will be located. And this is the minimum penalty, as they can easily go to prison for their forged sentences.

However, if it turns out that the entrepreneur was wrong himself and all the sentences passed by the judges who deal with economic cases were correct, all the documents and signatures were checked and all the judicial decisions of both judges who deal with economic cases were fair, then such an entrepreneur may be punished by being denied access to the entrepreneurial activity for a year, two, etc.

==Database of faithless entrepreneurs==

Maybe even indefinitely, until the person proves that he has become honest. Such an entrepreneur is also included in the database of faithless entrepreneurs. And even if he does business informally, regardless of the change of full name (the database will also monitor this), he will still remain in this database and any of his clients will be able to check him anytime.

By the way, this database is a very important advertisement for honesty and responsibility for all entrepreneurs, and especially for those who do something informally. That is, if a person is not in the database, then even if he is doing something informally, he already has some kind of trust, and at the same time, if he is there, then such a trust to him is unlikely at all.

And for unofficial entrepreneurs, it will even be beneficial to show their full names on their passport to their clients so that they can always check them in the database and choose them. A kind of mini-advertisement. Thus, once in the database, a person receives a verdict on his business activity. Moreover, the client will have doubts if such an entrepreneur does not show his full name on his passport and rather looks for someone else who is more open.

So both entrepreneurs and economic judges should remember their responsibility to society, which will very quickly find their sins and bring them to light.

==Officially registered entrepreneurs==

By the way, officially registered entrepreneurs can count not only on protection in court, but also on some benefits and subsidies, while if an entrepreneur's business is in a grey area, it is absolutely defenseless.

For example, he may be welshed by his client after he provides a service or sell a product. And it will be impossible to sue such a client, no one will defend such a grey entrepreneur. All the alleged documents that they signed with each other will be considered like a toilet paper and the client who dealt with such an entrepreneur will remain benefit. Therefore, it will always be better to register officially, calmly pay your tax and not worry about doing a business.

TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:29:07Z

Max9003: Created page with "Entrepreneurs, from the quotas provided to them for the region (the number of quotas is determined separately for each region), choose for themselves individual judges who deal only with economic cases. If an entrepreneur needs to resolve a controversion with another entrepreneur, then he sues such a judge (any free one he wants), if it seems to him that the judge is biased, then he can take the case again with the help of any other judge dealing with economic controver..."

Entrepreneurs, from the quotas provided to them for the region (the number of quotas is determined separately for each region), choose for themselves individual judges who deal only with economic cases.

If an entrepreneur needs to resolve a controversion with another entrepreneur, then he sues such a judge (any free one he wants), if it seems to him that the judge is biased, then he can take the case again with the help of any other judge dealing with economic controversions.

Anti-corruption protection

If an entrepreneur believes that all judges who deal with economic cases have been bought by some big business that always resolves controversions in its favor, and other entrepreneurs do not want to change these biased judges - these judges can be bought or intimidated, it does not matter. Then there is an opportunity to appeal in a special way to third-order executives (civil Judges) of four autonomies, one of them is necessarily the one where the entrepreneur himself is registered, and the other three are the nearest autonomies.

Judges of such autonomies will organize random juries who will consider the case of such an entrepreneur together. And if such a court comes to the conclusion that the entrepreneur is right and those judges who deal with economic cases to whom he appealed, passed an unfair verdict in his case, then such judges will be dismissed with disgrace and will be blacklisted regarding all possible posts and also entered into a special database where people who were dismissed in connection with the loss of trust will be located. And this is the minimum penalty, as they can easily go to prison for their forged sentences.

However, if it turns out that the entrepreneur was wrong himself and all the sentences passed by the judges who deal with economic cases were correct, all the documents and signatures were checked and all the judicial decisions of both judges who deal with economic cases were fair, then such an entrepreneur may be punished by being denied access to the entrepreneurial activity for a year, two, etc.

Database of faithless entrepreneurs

Maybe even indefinitely, until the person proves that he has become honest. Such an entrepreneur is also included in the database of faithless entrepreneurs. And even if he does business informally, regardless of the change of full name (the database will also monitor this), he will still remain in this database and any of his clients will be able to check him anytime.

By the way, this database is a very important advertisement for honesty and responsibility for all entrepreneurs, and especially for those who do something informally. That is, if a person is not in the database, then even if he is doing something informally, he already has some kind of trust, and at the same time, if he is there, then such a trust to him is unlikely at all.

And for unofficial entrepreneurs, it will even be beneficial to show their full names on their passport to their clients so that they can always check them in the database and choose them. A kind of mini-advertisement. Thus, once in the database, a person receives a verdict on his business activity. Moreover, the client will have doubts if such an entrepreneur does not show his full name on his passport and rather looks for someone else who is more open.

So both entrepreneurs and economic judges should remember their responsibility to society, which will very quickly find their sins and bring them to light.

Officially registered entrepreneurs

By the way, officially registered entrepreneurs can count not only on protection in court, but also on some benefits and subsidies, while if an entrepreneur's business is in a grey area, it is absolutely defenseless.

For example, he may be welshed by his client after he provides a service or sell a product. And it will be impossible to sue such a client, no one will defend such a grey entrepreneur. All the alleged documents that they signed with each other will be considered like a toilet paper and the client who dealt with such an entrepreneur will remain benefit. Therefore, it will always be better to register officially, calmly pay your tax and not worry about doing a business.

Main Page

2025-01-30T07:17:02Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:15:42Z

Max9003:

==Subtle aspects for crime scenes==

There are cases when, for example, a body or a crime scene is found outside cities, towns and villages (somewhere in the wilderness, for example) and then the question arises, who will be responsible for the discovery and who will have to initiate the investigation?

As always, everything is quite simple: for example, some forester discovered the crime scene, then he turns to his autonomy and transmits information about the discovery to a third-order executive (Judge) of his autonomy. If a homeless person has found it, they can contact any nearby autonomy. Then third-order executive (Judge) looks at the map for the five closest autonomies to the location (perhaps his autonomy will fall into this category, which is ok), then he reports the situation to these five third-order executives (Judges) and they, in turn, agree among themselves. Each of them allocates at least one policeman to assist the investigation, to travel to the place of criminal discovery, together they select a detective and appoint an investigation.

If the investigation has not yielded results (dead-end investigation), then the case is sent to the archive. If it has been possible to identify any possible people involved in crime or law violation, then the search for these people begins, their identities and places of residence are established. And then everything is standard, if the person (suspect) is found, his autonomy is established (if he is not homeless), then after a full investigation, a jury and a court are appointed.

==Mass brawls==

There are cases of mass brawls. If this happens, then the third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the mass brawl is taking place, or several third-order executives (Judges) on the border of the autonomies (if there is a mass brawl here and there), in which all this is happening, request help from the special police forces (SORT, SRT, SPF, SWAT, special police squad and so on), indicating to them how many people are fighting and how much effort should be allocated to eliminate the disorder.

Then the special police forces arrive and stop the brawl. If suddenly attacks occur even on special police forces, then such brawlers are necessarily dragged out of the crowd and sent to a paddy wagon, and then to a special holding cells at the special police forces building. This is a separate building in a locality and is subordinate only to the management of this special police forces. If it was not possible to get them out of the crowd, then they are wanted.

One way or another, those brawlers who was found or placed to a special holding cells at the special police forces building interrogated, their identity is established, established the autonomy in which they live, and proceedings begin between the autonomies of the injured policeman from the special police forces and the person who attacked him and who participated in that brawl.

Since the special police forces are carrying out the task and their actions can sometimes be quite harsh, but necessary to ensure order on the street, they will be seriously lenient in court.

How it will manifest itself: instead of the usual proceedings between citizens in an incomprehensible situation, when four jurors from each side and one random ninth juror from any autonomy that is not related to the proceedings. Everything will be a little different in favor of the special police forces, namely: on the part of the special police forces, in such a situation there will be four jurors. Two more jurors will be randomly selected from any DIFFERENT autonomies that the injured special forces policeman wants besides his own autonomy.

This results in four jurors from the injured party, two random jurors from any two autonomies that the special forces policeman chose himself, two from the attacker's side and one completely independent juror. There are only nine jurors.

It turns out that the injured special forces policeman is in a more advantageous situation, as he defended order on the street. And if it becomes obvious that he is not guilty, but only answered and acted out of necessity (which will also be decided by the most independent jurors), then he will most likely be recognized as a victim, since all those independent jurors may need his help at any moment and they are interested in this.

But if jurors consider that his actions were disproportionate or too harsh, then he may be dismissed from the special police forces and dismissed with consequences for his family, as already described above, in the cases of various executives. Or even he may be punished with imprisonment. But he have to be a real crazy man, being bats if he smashing the faces of the participants of the brawl just because he wanted to do so.

In 99% of cases, if a person is assigned to protect order on the street and this will be clearly visible on the same cameras or/and interviews with witnesses (if necessary using a polygraph), then the jury formed in the way described above, of course will side with the defender of order and this is correct and logical.

JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:13:46Z

Max9003:

==Direct harm or violence model==

We would like to note that the entire new judiciary system will be based only on purely direct harm or violence. In other words, this means that all the nonsense that is now called "protection of honor and dignity" and other similar nonsense will simply be thrown into the trash. There is no need to overload the courts with all sorts of unnecessary garbage. People should understand for themselves that if unsubstantiated and fabricated nasty things are written about you, for any reason, then this is most likely 99.9% lies.

That is, it will no longer be possible to say in court something like: "I have suffered moral harm and now I want a hundred-thousand-million in compensation."

However, there will be one thing, namely: for example, if the so-called moral harm was INTENTIONALLY caused, as something like - privacy of correspondence, medical confidentiality, etc. is violated. In general, this is exactly what can cause so-called "moral harm" but again, I repeat that this was done INTENTIONALLY to obviously cause so-called "moral harm," but it does not cause direct harm or violence.

In this case, if the victim of this moral harm causes mild to moderate damage to physical health (including damage to personal property) to the one who caused this "moral harm", then in court, the accused who initially suffered from "moral harm" and then committed the crime, depending on the situation itself, may receive notable leniency from the jury.

To the point that he may simply be released from custody. And yes, it is precisely such cases that are always considered by a jury.

But this point, we repeat, extends exclusively to the one who suffered and the one who caused these "moral harm" and then, not always and depending on the circumstances that the jury will determine for themselves - how much they are worth leniency and whether they are worth it at all.

That is, if the victim of "moral harm" brought his friends with him to punish the one who caused him "moral harm", then there will be no leniency towards his friends when they are caught and judged.

==Organization of the trial==

Offices/courtrooms for trial should be provided in each autonomy. A record is kept in court, either on paper or with video and audio recordings for the minutes. If possible, trials can also be conducted online using a software, specially created for this purpose.

If a witness in court is someone's relative, then such a witness is immediately marked with a special status so that everyone knows this and treats his testimony with caution.

==Subtle aspects of the new judiciary system==

It is precisely because of this new judiciary scheme, for example, that it will be impossible to sue any propagandists from any mass media, because of whom families may have collapsed or relatives with opposite political points of view stopped communicating.

Someone might object and say, "Well, how is that?! It was because of them that all this happened, that they propagandized, instigated and pitted against each other." Yes it is, they are literally provokers. But why do people need brains? Are they biorobots?! No. Therefore, people must learn to think, find compromises and be able to negotiate, be able to criticize and think.

The propagandist is just provoking, yes, he is not a good person, he has chosen his destructive path, but in the end, he is just a provoker, he does not commit violence himself and does not directly cause harm. He will do it with your hands, but since you are not biorobots, your are thinking people, so you can come to reasonable conclusions yourself, that it is not necessary to listen to him and it is generally dangerous. And you need to criticize his every word, even if it is like a honey in the ears at first glance.

==Social ostracism greatly simplifies the use of the new judiciary system==

At the same time, nothing prevents you from not doing business with such a person with a well-known bad reputation as destructive mass media propagandist. Everyone will know him by sight, and someone won't rent him an apartment, someone won't serve him in a restaurant, and so on. And no one can do anything to such people, because it is their right not to respect a particular person.

In the same restaurant, for example, the manager will not get angry with the waiter, since he himself holds the opinion that this person does not belong here, and all the visitors will agree with them.

In this regard, in the new DSMN system, much will be built on the principle of respect. If a person engages in some kind of activity in such a way that society respects him, then it will be much easier for him to live in this society. And if a person engages in activities in such a way that society does not respect him, then it will be much more difficult for him to live in this society.

Sometimes social ostracism is worse than imprisonment. It will be very difficult for such people with a well-known bad reputation to live in a country based on the DSMN system where they cannot be tolerated and almost everyone in the society put grit in their bearings on all legal grounds. It will be easier for them to move to another country or sincerely repent to society and never engage in destructive activity again.

JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:12:23Z

Max9003:

==Jury and a lot of victims==

If we are talking about an attempt to convict such persons, who, for example, are suspected of committing fraud (where it is not fully clear whether there was fraud or not), allegedly deceiving 1,000 or even 10,000 people or more, for example, some tour operators, construction companies with equity participation and other organizations that allegedly promised and they signed a contract for ONE THING, but they finally gave a completely DIFFERENT one, according to the victims.

In this case, a jury is going to be held in the same way, and if everything is clear with the accused, as usual, 4 jurors are allocated from his the accused's autonomy, who will defend him rather than convict him, then everything becomes a little different with the prosecution.

Since there can be a lot of victims, and only 4 people on their side are needed for the jury, the selection of these 4 jurors also occurs randomly among all those who agreed to be on the jury at one time, BUT only from ALL those autonomies where there are victims live.

Thus, a jury trial can take place regardless of the number of victims, even in such ambiguous, not fully understood situations.

==Jury and homeless person's case==

How will the jury trial take place if the case concerns the homeless? After all, they do not have registration.

If a crime has been committed against a homeless person (direct harm and/or violence), then he has the right to apply to the first autonomy he finds for help - to the police, to the third-order executive (Judge), to the second-order executive (Prosecutor) of this autonomy.

When applying, a homeless person has the right to choose any autonomy of a city or region, if suddenly this locality where the crime occurred turns out to be one autonomy in the form of a small village, for example, and the homeless person does not want to have a jury from there.

Such an autonomy chosen by a homeless person has no right to refuse him and must fulfill its duty to help this person. Even if there is a judicial workload, this homeless man's case will still be a priority.

If necessary, the criminal suspect is taken to the holding cell of the autonomy where he is registered.

Next, the third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies randomly select the 9th juror (who may not be needed) from the autonomies of the city or region, then there is an investigation and a trial follows, everything is as usual.

If, for some reason, the court and the investigation are delayed and any third-order executives (Judges) and second-order executives (Prosecutors) don't care about it and no one wants to decide anything, thinking that no one will stand up for the homeless person, then the homeless person can easily contact any mass media.

How will the court act if the crime was committed by a homeless person? If the person against whom the crime was committed (direct harm and/or violence) is not homeless, then almost everything is as usual, the case is transferred to the autonomy where the victim is registered, and the homeless person who commited a crime is taken to a holding cell, but the holding cell should be of any other autonomy that the homeless person chooses.

And if he refuses to choose, or does not understand, or cannot say or somehow explain where he wants to go and there is no way to understand this from him and get an answer, then he is taken to any holding cell, except for the one that is in the autonomy of the victim. And the third-order executive (Judge) decides this randomly, drawing lots, for example of the 3 most remote autonomies from the autonomy of the injured party.

From the same autonomy where the homeless person was brought to the holding cell or which he chose, he receives help in the form of a jury in court. The third-order executives (Judges) of both autonomies select a randomly selected 9th juror and then conduct an investigation and trial.

What happens if a crime (direct harm and/or violence) was committed by one homeless person against another homeless person?

The injured homeless person also applies to any nearest autonomy for help, then chooses any autonomy that wants to protect his interests in the form of a jury in court.

A homeless person who has committed a crime is caught and taken to a holding cell. So the criminal suspect chooses his own holding cell. Or a third-order executive (Judge) from the injured party does this by drawing lots, as already described above, if suddenly the criminal suspect cannot explain himself for any reason. Again, he cannot end up in a holding cell of the autonomy where the injured homeless person asked for help.

Further, the homeless criminal suspect receives help in the form of a jury in court from the autonomy in which he somehow ended up in the holding cell. Again, the 9th juror is randomly selected by the third-order executives (Judges) of both autonomies, and then the investigation and trial proceed. And of course, lawyers are involved in all cases.

==Jury and foreigner's case==

Foreigners will be sued as follows: if a foreigner wants to punish someone who has committed a crime against him, then he turns to the first autonomy he finds - to the police, to a third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor).

Then it turns out who the criminal suspect is and where he is registered. The third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the possible criminal is registered refers the case to the third-order executive (Judge) of any neighboring autonomy. And this case is a priority and must be resolved as soon as possible.

The new third-order executive (Judge) launches an investigation, calls a detective, etc., then a jury is selected, and there is one point here - since the crime was against a foreigner, the jury will be selected in a different way.

Namely, only two jurors are selected from the autonomy of the criminal suspect, the remaining seven will be selected from any of the nearest autonomies (even in the region, even in the city) by the foreigner himself, but no more than one juror from one autonomy. After the investigation, a court is appointed and the case is resolved.

If the criminal suspect is homeless, then two jurors are selected from the autonomies that the homeless person wants, the rest of the jurors are selected by a foreigner from any nearby autonomies, one juror from each autonomy, but not from those autonomies from where the homeless person chose them.

If the situation is reversed, that is, a foreigner is being criminal suspect, then: the victim goes to the police, to the third-order executive (Judge), to the second-order executive (Prosecutor) of the nearest autonomy where the foreigner is located. A foreigner is sent into custody, BUT only to a holding cell in any of the autonomies except the one from which the victim himself came from. Or except autonomy the homeless person chose.

The case is then referred to a third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy that the victim came from or which one the homeless person chose. The third-order executive (Judge) appoints an investigation, and a jury is selected. And there is one distinctive point - all jurors are selected from any nearby autonomies, but only except for the one from which the victim himself came or which one the homeless person chose.

This is done so that the court is as impartial as possible. After that, an investigation and trial are finally conducted. If the victim is homeless, then he chooses the autonomy himself, which will carry out all the procedures mentioned above when a foreigner as criminal suspect.

If we have two foreigners and one foreigner has caused direct harm and/or violence to another foreigner, then the victim can also contact any nearest autonomy for help.

A third-order executive (Judge) of this particular autonomy, where the victim has applied, proceeds with the case (and this case has high priority), appoints an investigation and a jury is selected.

Both foreigners have the right to choose a jury from any autonomies of the region or city, but only with the exception of one, the ninth juror, who will still be randomly selected. Next, the third-order executive (Judge) appoints an investigation, after which the trial follows. And of course, lawyers are involved in all cases.

==Jury actions in court==

Regarding jury votes for guilty or not-guilty verdict. Jurors can vote only after they have listened to everyone they can and their claims against each other (detectives, lawyers, witnesses, specialists, etc.) and after viewing and listening to all possible video and audio materials for the trial.

As usual, the third-order executive (Judge) is the leader in the trial, he announces the speech of one or another person at his request or the request of the jury, as well as whom the third-order executive (Judge) or the jury just want to interview themselves according to their own understanding.

After everyone has been heard, the jury retires to a meeting, which can last up to 7 hours. After the meeting, the voting process begins. Voting is always done in secret. Thus, if the vote is NOT unanimous, then the secret remains about who voted and how.

Detectives, lawyers, and specialists are required to answer questions from the jury and the third-order executive (Judge). But witnesses can simply leave if they want, but in this case, the testimony in court would instantly lose its validity, even if it was known in advance to the third-order executive (Judge) and the jury, since the witness must testify using a polygraph, whether it is an online or offline trial mode.

CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T07:10:14Z

Max9003: Created page with "Subtle aspects for crime scenes There are cases when, for example, a body or a crime scene is found outside cities, towns and villages (somewhere in the wilderness, for example) and then the question arises, who will be responsible for the discovery and who will have to initiate the investigation? As always, everything is quite simple: for example, some forester discovered the crime scene, then he turns to his autonomy and transmits information about the discovery to a..."

Subtle aspects for crime scenes

There are cases when, for example, a body or a crime scene is found outside cities, towns and villages (somewhere in the wilderness, for example) and then the question arises, who will be responsible for the discovery and who will have to initiate the investigation?

As always, everything is quite simple: for example, some forester discovered the crime scene, then he turns to his autonomy and transmits information about the discovery to a third-order executive (Judge) of his autonomy. If a homeless person has found it, they can contact any nearby autonomy. Then third-order executive (Judge) looks at the map for the five closest autonomies to the location (perhaps his autonomy will fall into this category, which is ok), then he reports the situation to these five third-order executives (Judges) and they, in turn, agree among themselves. Each of them allocates at least one policeman to assist the investigation, to travel to the place of criminal discovery, together they select a detective and appoint an investigation.

If the investigation has not yielded results (dead-end investigation), then the case is sent to the archive. If it has been possible to identify any possible people involved in crime or law violation, then the search for these people begins, their identities and places of residence are established. And then everything is standard, if the person (suspect) is found, his autonomy is established (if he is not homeless), then after a full investigation, a jury and a court are appointed.

Mass brawls

There are cases of mass brawls. If this happens, then the third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the mass brawl is taking place, or several third-order executives (Judges) on the border of the autonomies (if there is a mass brawl here and there), in which all this is happening, request help from the special police forces (SORT, SRT, SPF, SWAT, special police squad and so on), indicating to them how many people are fighting and how much effort should be allocated to eliminate the disorder.

Then the special police forces arrive and stop the brawl. If suddenly attacks occur even on special police forces, then such brawlers are necessarily dragged out of the crowd and sent to a paddy wagon, and then to a special holding cells at the special police forces building. This is a separate building in a locality and is subordinate only to the management of this special police forces. If it was not possible to get them out of the crowd, then they are wanted.

One way or another, those brawlers who was found or placed to a special holding cells at the special police forces building interrogated, their identity is established, established the autonomy in which they live, and proceedings begin between the autonomies of the injured policeman from the special police forces and the person who attacked him and who participated in that brawl.

Since the special police forces are carrying out the task and their actions can sometimes be quite harsh, but necessary to ensure order on the street, they will be seriously lenient in court.

How it will manifest itself: instead of the usual proceedings between citizens in an incomprehensible situation, when four jurors from each side and one random ninth juror from any autonomy that is not related to the proceedings. Everything will be a little different in favor of the special police forces, namely: on the part of the special police forces, in such a situation there will be four jurors. Two more jurors will be randomly selected from any DIFFERENT autonomies that the injured special forces policeman wants besides his own autonomy.

This results in four jurors from the injured party, two random jurors from any two autonomies that the special forces policeman chose himself, two from the attacker's side and one completely independent juror. There are only nine jurors.

It turns out that the injured special forces policeman is in a more advantageous situation, as he defended order on the street. And if it becomes obvious that he is not guilty, but only answered and acted out of necessity (which will also be decided by the most independent jurors), then he will most likely be recognized as a victim, since all those independent jurors may need his help at any moment and they are interested in this.

But if jurors consider that his actions were disproportionate or too harsh, then he may be dismissed from the special police forces and dismissed with consequences for his family, as already described above, in the cases of various executives. Or even he may be punished with imprisonment. But he have to be a real crazy man, being bats if he smashing the faces of the participants of the brawl just because he wanted to do so.

In 99% of cases, if a person is assigned to protect order on the street and this will be clearly visible on the same cameras or/and interviews with witnesses (if necessary using a polygraph), then the jury formed in the way described above, of course will side with the defender of order and this is correct and logical.

Jury actions in court

Regarding jury votes for guilty or not-guilty verdict. Jurors can vote only after they have listened to everyone they can and their claims against each other (detectives, lawyers, witnesses, specialists, etc.) and after viewing and listening to all possible video and audio materials for the trial.

As usual, the third-order executive (Judge) is the leader in the trial, he announces the speech of one or another person at his request or the request of the jury, as well as whom the third-order executive (Judge) or the jury just want to interview themselves according to their own understanding.

After everyone has been heard, the jury retires to a meeting, which can last up to 7 hours. After the meeting, the voting process begins. Voting is always done in secret. Thus, if the vote is NOT unanimous, then the secret remains about who voted and how.

Detectives, lawyers, and specialists are required to answer questions from the jury and the third-order executive (Judge). But witnesses can simply leave if they want, but in this case, the testimony in court would instantly lose its validity, even if it was known in advance to the third-order executive (Judge) and the jury, since the witness must testify using a polygraph, whether it is an online or offline trial mode.

Organization of the trial

Offices/courtrooms for trial should be provided in each autonomy. A record is kept in court, either on paper or with video and audio recordings for the minutes. If possible, trials can also be conducted online using a software, specially created for this purpose.

If a witness in court is someone's relative, then such a witness is immediately marked with a special status so that everyone knows this and treats his testimony with caution.

MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:43:51Z

Max9003: /* Bonuses and prizes for mass media journalists */

==Bonuses and prizes for mass media journalists==

The mass media (including private ones) will be designed in such a way that if they find violations or non-fulfillment of executives duties with facts and evidence, then such a journalist receives, firstly, a prize from the state, and secondly, the very department of this mass media, in which this journalist is involved, for the next month will be fully provided at the expense of the state.

The award to journalists and payments to the mass media are issued through the city council. Moreover, all doors to any executive's offices are open to journalists of any mass media and without any expectations (provided that the executive's case is not an emergency, i.e. someone's life and health do not depend on it) and they are required to devote at least an hour a day if journalists of some mass media suddenly want to visit them every day.

==The right of a journalist to receive the materials he needs==

And if a journalist comes with a possible victim of an executive's lawlessness and asks to provide all the video and audio materials of a conversation with this possible victim from this executive in order to verify the victim's words and confirm or deny what the possible victim said, then these materials should be given immediately to the journalist. No delays or complaints.

==Special servers and access to them of mass media journalists==

All recordings (video and audio) that are made during conversations in the offices of executives (with residents or official consultations between executives) are duplicated on a special server.

This server is controlled by a special network administrator in a specially equipped office with no windows and a steel door, which only this network administrator has access to, who in turn is randomly selected from willing network administrators throughout the city. Such network administrators are selected by the city council on camera by drawing lots.

These administrators do not obey anyone except representatives of licensed mass media, to whom, upon request, they must provide a copy of the video and audio recordings of any consultations and conversations of executives from any of their offices where the recording is conducted. HOWEVER, only on condition that journalists have a citizen's appeal to these very mass media with a complaint against a particular executive and the lawlessness that he has caused against this citizen.

It is the responsibility of administrators to monitor the functioning of the backup server system so that they are always in good working condition. At the same time, it is necessary to make somehow that the network administrator has access only to the requested record from journalists of licensed mass media only at the time of its issuance to the journalist, but he can not view the records or could not open it by himself, for example, without knowing the password. The main point here - responsibility of network administrators is only to store data, and they should not have access to the data itself (open video and audio files, watch and listen them).

Only 75% of the third-order executives (Judges) of the city who voted for it can dismiss the network administrator who monitors the recording servers and then the city council immediately selects a new network administrator.

In the office of the network administrator, video surveillance and audio recording are also constantly conducted directly behind the equipment from which he can make a copy of the recordings stored on a special server. The administrator's desk and his personal PC remains without video surveillance. Video surveillance and audio recording from the network administrator's office is available to all third-order executives (Judges) and second-order executives (Prosecutors) of the city at any time.

Main Page

2025-01-30T06:42:32Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:40:57Z

Max9003:

==Bonuses and prizes for mass media journalists==

The mass media system (including private ones) will be designed in such a way that if they find violations or non-fulfillment of executives duties with facts and evidence, then such a journalist receives, firstly, a prize from the state, and secondly, the very department of this mass media, in which this journalist is involved, for the next month will be fully provided at the expense of the state.

The award to journalists and payments to the mass media are issued through the city council. Moreover, all doors to any executive's offices are open to journalists of any mass media and without any expectations (provided that the executive's case is not an emergency, i.e. someone's life and health do not depend on it) and they are required to devote at least an hour a day if journalists of some mass media suddenly want to visit them every day.

==The right of a journalist to receive the materials he needs==

And if a journalist comes with a possible victim of an executive's lawlessness and asks to provide all the video and audio materials of a conversation with this possible victim from this executive in order to verify the victim's words and confirm or deny what the possible victim said, then these materials should be given immediately to the journalist. No delays or complaints.

==Special servers and access to them of mass media journalists==

All recordings (video and audio) that are made during conversations in the offices of executives (with residents or official consultations between executives) are duplicated on a special server.

This server is controlled by a special network administrator in a specially equipped office with no windows and a steel door, which only this network administrator has access to, who in turn is randomly selected from willing network administrators throughout the city. Such network administrators are selected by the city council on camera by drawing lots.

These administrators do not obey anyone except representatives of licensed mass media, to whom, upon request, they must provide a copy of the video and audio recordings of any consultations and conversations of executives from any of their offices where the recording is conducted. HOWEVER, only on condition that journalists have a citizen's appeal to these very mass media with a complaint against a particular executive and the lawlessness that he has caused against this citizen.

It is the responsibility of administrators to monitor the functioning of the backup server system so that they are always in good working condition. At the same time, it is necessary to make somehow that the network administrator has access only to the requested record from journalists of licensed mass media only at the time of its issuance to the journalist, but he can not view the records or could not open it by himself, for example, without knowing the password. The main point here - responsibility of network administrators is only to store data, and they should not have access to the data itself (open video and audio files, watch and listen them).

Only 75% of the third-order executives (Judges) of the city who voted for it can dismiss the network administrator who monitors the recording servers and then the city council immediately selects a new network administrator.

In the office of the network administrator, video surveillance and audio recording are also constantly conducted directly behind the equipment from which he can make a copy of the recordings stored on a special server. The administrator's desk and his personal PC remains without video surveillance. Video surveillance and audio recording from the network administrator's office is available to all third-order executives (Judges) and second-order executives (Prosecutors) of the city at any time.

MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:39:59Z

Max9003: Created page with "Bonuses and prizes for mass media journalists The mass media system (including private ones) will be designed in such a way that if they find violations or non-fulfillment of executives duties with facts and evidence, then such a journalist receives, firstly, a prize from the state, and secondly, the very department of this mass media, in which this journalist is involved, for the next month will be fully provided at the expense of the state. The award to journalists..."

Bonuses and prizes for mass media journalists

The mass media system (including private ones) will be designed in such a way that if they find violations or non-fulfillment of executives duties with facts and evidence, then such a journalist receives, firstly, a prize from the state, and secondly, the very department of this mass media, in which this journalist is involved, for the next month will be fully provided at the expense of the state.

The award to journalists and payments to the mass media are issued through the city council. Moreover, all doors to any executive's offices are open to journalists of any mass media and without any expectations (provided that the executive's case is not an emergency, i.e. someone's life and health do not depend on it) and they are required to devote at least an hour a day if journalists of some mass media suddenly want to visit them every day.

The right of a journalist to receive the materials he needs

And if a journalist comes with a possible victim of an executive's lawlessness and asks to provide all the video and audio materials of a conversation with this possible victim from this executive in order to verify the victim's words and confirm or deny what the possible victim said, then these materials should be given immediately to the journalist. No delays or complaints.

Special servers and access to them of mass media journalists

All recordings (video and audio) that are made during conversations in the offices of executives (with residents or official consultations between executives) are duplicated on a special server.

This server is controlled by a special network administrator in a specially equipped office with no windows and a steel door, which only this network administrator has access to, who in turn is randomly selected from willing network administrators throughout the city. Such network administrators are selected by the city council on camera by drawing lots.

These administrators do not obey anyone except representatives of licensed mass media, to whom, upon request, they must provide a copy of the video and audio recordings of any consultations and conversations of executives from any of their offices where the recording is conducted. HOWEVER, only on condition that journalists have a citizen's appeal to these very mass media with a complaint against a particular executive and the lawlessness that he has caused against this citizen.

It is the responsibility of administrators to monitor the functioning of the backup server system so that they are always in good working condition. At the same time, it is necessary to make somehow that the network administrator has access only to the requested record from journalists of licensed mass media only at the time of its issuance to the journalist, but he can not view the records or could not open it by himself, for example, without knowing the password. The main point here - responsibility of network administrators is only to store data, and they should not have access to the data itself (open video and audio files, watch and listen them).

Only 75% of the third-order executives (Judges) of the city who voted for it can dismiss the network administrator who monitors the recording servers and then the city council immediately selects a new network administrator.

In the office of the network administrator, video surveillance and audio recording are also constantly conducted directly behind the equipment from which he can make a copy of the recordings stored on a special server. The administrator's desk and his personal PC remains without video surveillance. Video surveillance and audio recording from the network administrator's office is available to all third-order executives (Judges) and second-order executives (Prosecutors) of the city at any time.

Main Page

2025-01-30T06:29:01Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:28:21Z

Max9003:

JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:27:29Z

Max9003: Created page with "Jury and a lot of victims If we are talking about an attempt to convict such persons, who, for example, are suspected of committing fraud (where it is not fully clear whether there was fraud or not), allegedly deceiving 1,000 or even 10,000 people or more, for example, some tour operators, construction companies with equity participation and other organizations that allegedly promised and they signed a contract for ONE THING, but they finally gave a completely DIFFERENT..."

Jury and a lot of victims

If we are talking about an attempt to convict such persons, who, for example, are suspected of committing fraud (where it is not fully clear whether there was fraud or not), allegedly deceiving 1,000 or even 10,000 people or more, for example, some tour operators, construction companies with equity participation and other organizations that allegedly promised and they signed a contract for ONE THING, but they finally gave a completely DIFFERENT one, according to the victims.

In this case, a jury is going to be held in the same way, and if everything is clear with the accused, as usual, 4 jurors are allocated from his the accused's autonomy, who will defend him rather than convict him, then everything becomes a little different with the prosecution.

Since there can be a lot of victims, and only 4 people on their side are needed for the jury, the selection of these 4 jurors also occurs randomly among all those who agreed to be on the jury at one time, BUT only from ALL those autonomies where there are victims live.

Thus, a jury trial can take place regardless of the number of victims, even in such ambiguous, not fully understood situations.

Jury and homeless person's case

How will the jury trial take place if the case concerns the homeless? After all, they do not have registration.

If a crime has been committed against a homeless person (direct harm and/or violence), then he has the right to apply to the first autonomy he finds for help - to the police, to the third-order executive (Judge), to the second-order executive (Prosecutor) of this autonomy.

When applying, a homeless person has the right to choose any autonomy of a city or region, if suddenly this locality where the crime occurred turns out to be one autonomy in the form of a small village, for example, and the homeless person does not want to have a jury from there.

Such an autonomy chosen by a homeless person has no right to refuse him and must fulfill its duty to help this person. Even if there is a judicial workload, this homeless man's case will still be a priority.

If necessary, the criminal suspect is taken to the holding cell of the autonomy where he is registered.

Next, the third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies randomly select the 9th juror (who may not be needed) from the autonomies of the city or region, then there is an investigation and a trial follows, everything is as usual.

If, for some reason, the court and the investigation are delayed and any third-order executives (Judges) and second-order executives (Prosecutors) don't care about it and no one wants to decide anything, thinking that no one will stand up for the homeless person, then the homeless person can easily contact any mass media.

How will the court act if the crime was committed by a homeless person? If the person against whom the crime was committed (direct harm and/or violence) is not homeless, then almost everything is as usual, the case is transferred to the autonomy where the victim is registered, and the homeless person who commited a crime is taken to a holding cell, but the holding cell should be of any other autonomy that the homeless person chooses.

And if he refuses to choose, or does not understand, or cannot say or somehow explain where he wants to go and there is no way to understand this from him and get an answer, then he is taken to any holding cell, except for the one that is in the autonomy of the victim. And the third-order executive (Judge) decides this randomly, drawing lots, for example of the 3 most remote autonomies from the autonomy of the injured party.

From the same autonomy where the homeless person was brought to the holding cell or which he chose, he receives help in the form of a jury in court. The third-order executives (Judges) of both autonomies select a randomly selected 9th juror and then conduct an investigation and trial.

What happens if a crime (direct harm and/or violence) was committed by one homeless person against another homeless person?

The injured homeless person also applies to any nearest autonomy for help, then chooses any autonomy that wants to protect his interests in the form of a jury in court.

A homeless person who has committed a crime is caught and taken to a holding cell. So the criminal suspect chooses his own holding cell. Or a third-order executive (Judge) from the injured party does this by drawing lots, as already described above, if suddenly the criminal suspect cannot explain himself for any reason. Again, he cannot end up in a holding cell of the autonomy where the injured homeless person asked for help.

Further, the homeless criminal suspect receives help in the form of a jury in court from the autonomy in which he somehow ended up in the holding cell. Again, the 9th juror is randomly selected by the third-order executives (Judges) of both autonomies, and then the investigation and trial proceed. And of course, lawyers are involved in all cases.

Jury and foreigner's case

Foreigners will be sued as follows: if a foreigner wants to punish someone who has committed a crime against him, then he turns to the first autonomy he finds - to the police, to a third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor).

Then it turns out who the criminal suspect is and where he is registered. The third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the possible criminal is registered refers the case to the third-order executive (Judge) of any neighboring autonomy. And this case is a priority and must be resolved as soon as possible.

The new third-order executive (Judge) launches an investigation, calls a detective, etc., then a jury is selected, and there is one point here - since the crime was against a foreigner, the jury will be selected in a different way.

Namely, only two jurors are selected from the autonomy of the criminal suspect, the remaining seven will be selected from any of the nearest autonomies (even in the region, even in the city) by the foreigner himself, but no more than one juror from one autonomy. After the investigation, a court is appointed and the case is resolved.

If the criminal suspect is homeless, then two jurors are selected from the autonomies that the homeless person wants, the rest of the jurors are selected by a foreigner from any nearby autonomies, one juror from each autonomy, but not from those autonomies from where the homeless person chose them.

If the situation is reversed, that is, a foreigner is being criminal suspect, then: the victim goes to the police, to the third-order executive (Judge), to the second-order executive (Prosecutor) of the nearest autonomy where the foreigner is located. A foreigner is sent into custody, BUT only to a holding cell in any of the autonomies except the one from which the victim himself came from. Or except autonomy the homeless person chose.

The case is then referred to a third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy that the victim came from or which one the homeless person chose. The third-order executive (Judge) appoints an investigation, and a jury is selected. And there is one distinctive point - all jurors are selected from any nearby autonomies, but only except for the one from which the victim himself came or which one the homeless person chose.

This is done so that the court is as impartial as possible. After that, an investigation and trial are finally conducted. If the victim is homeless, then he chooses the autonomy himself, which will carry out all the procedures mentioned above when a foreigner as criminal suspect.

If we have two foreigners and one foreigner has caused direct harm and/or violence to another foreigner, then the victim can also contact any nearest autonomy for help.

A third-order executive (Judge) of this particular autonomy, where the victim has applied, proceeds with the case (and this case has high priority), appoints an investigation and a jury is selected.

Both foreigners have the right to choose a jury from any autonomies of the region or city, but only with the exception of one, the ninth juror, who will still be randomly selected. Next, the third-order executive (Judge) appoints an investigation, after which the trial follows. And of course, lawyers are involved in all cases.

Main Page

2025-01-30T06:12:05Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:11:39Z

Max9003: Created page with "People (suspects) who may have committed a crime and are on their own recognizance bond, for example, and whose case will be considered by a jury. Suddenly they decided to move to a new place, hoping to deceive the system, saying that the jury in the new autonomy, not knowing them, would justify them as much as they can. Since the jurors in the new autonomy don't know them yet anyway, or won't know them for a long time, but only from the good side. These suspects will on..."

People (suspects) who may have committed a crime and are on their own recognizance bond, for example, and whose case will be considered by a jury. Suddenly they decided to move to a new place, hoping to deceive the system, saying that the jury in the new autonomy, not knowing them, would justify them as much as they can. Since the jurors in the new autonomy don't know them yet anyway, or won't know them for a long time, but only from the good side. These suspects will only deceive themselves, since the court will always assemble a jury from the autonomy where such a possible criminal suspect lived at the time of the crime.

It is advisable to give an example. For example, a man crashed a neighbor's car at night, it seems that witnesses saw him, but it's impossible to say for sure whether it was him or not. As a result, it will be decided by those jurors who lived with this person before his moving to another place, because they know his disposition, which can significantly affect the verdict.

Main Page

2025-01-30T06:01:57Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T06:00:23Z

Max9003:

==Direct harm or violence model==

We would like to note that the entire new judiciary system will be based only on purely direct harm or violence. In other words, this means that all the nonsense that is now called "protection of honor and dignity" and other similar nonsense will simply be thrown into the trash. There is no need to overload the courts with all sorts of unnecessary garbage. People should understand for themselves that if unsubstantiated and fabricated nasty things are written about you, for any reason, then this is most likely 99.9% lies.

That is, it will no longer be possible to say in court something like: "I have suffered moral harm and now I want a hundred-thousand-million in compensation."

However, there will be one thing, namely: for example, if the so-called moral harm was INTENTIONALLY caused, as something like - privacy of correspondence, medical confidentiality, etc. is violated. In general, this is exactly what can cause so-called "moral harm" but again, I repeat that this was done INTENTIONALLY to obviously cause so-called "moral harm," but it does not cause direct harm or violence.

In this case, if the victim of this moral harm causes mild to moderate damage to physical health (including damage to personal property) to the one who caused this "moral harm", then in court, the accused who initially suffered from "moral harm" and then committed the crime, depending on the situation itself, may receive notable leniency from the jury.

To the point that he may simply be released from custody. And yes, it is precisely such cases that are always considered by a jury.

But this point, we repeat, extends exclusively to the one who suffered and the one who caused these "moral harm" and then, not always and depending on the circumstances that the jury will determine for themselves - how much they are worth leniency and whether they are worth it at all.

That is, if the victim of "moral harm" brought his friends with him to punish the one who caused him "moral harm", then there will be no leniency towards his friends when they are caught and judged.

==Subtle aspects of the new judiciary system==

It is precisely because of this new judiciary scheme, for example, that it will be impossible to sue any propagandists from any mass media, because of whom families may have collapsed or relatives with opposite political points of view stopped communicating.

Someone might object and say, "Well, how is that?! It was because of them that all this happened, that they propagandized, instigated and pitted against each other." Yes it is, they are literally provokers. But why do people need brains? Are they biorobots?! No. Therefore, people must learn to think, find compromises and be able to negotiate, be able to criticize and think.

The propagandist is just provoking, yes, he is not a good person, he has chosen his destructive path, but in the end, he is just a provoker, he does not commit violence himself and does not directly cause harm. He will do it with your hands, but since you are not biorobots, your are thinking people, so you can come to reasonable conclusions yourself, that it is not necessary to listen to him and it is generally dangerous. And you need to criticize his every word, even if it is like a honey in the ears at first glance.

==Social ostracism greatly simplifies the use of the new judiciary system==

At the same time, nothing prevents you from not doing business with such a person with a well-known bad reputation as destructive mass media propagandist. Everyone will know him by sight, and someone won't rent him an apartment, someone won't serve him in a restaurant, and so on. And no one can do anything to such people, because it is their right not to respect a particular person.

In the same restaurant, for example, the manager will not get angry with the waiter, since he himself holds the opinion that this person does not belong here, and all the visitors will agree with them.

In this regard, in the new DSMN system, much will be built on the principle of respect. If a person engages in some kind of activity in such a way that society respects him, then it will be much easier for him to live in this society. And if a person engages in activities in such a way that society does not respect him, then it will be much more difficult for him to live in this society.

Sometimes social ostracism is worse than imprisonment. It will be very difficult for such people with a well-known bad reputation to live in a country based on the DSMN system where they cannot be tolerated and almost everyone in the society put grit in their bearings on all legal grounds. It will be easier for them to move to another country or sincerely repent to society and never engage in destructive activity again.

JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T05:57:44Z

Max9003: Created page with "Direct harm or violence model We would like to note that the entire new judiciary system will be based only on purely direct harm or violence. In other words, this means that all the nonsense that is now called "protection of honor and dignity" and other similar nonsense will simply be thrown into the trash. There is no need to overload the courts with all sorts of unnecessary garbage. People should understand for themselves that if unsubstantiated and fabricated nasty..."

Direct harm or violence model

We would like to note that the entire new judiciary system will be based only on purely direct harm or violence. In other words, this means that all the nonsense that is now called "protection of honor and dignity" and other similar nonsense will simply be thrown into the trash. There is no need to overload the courts with all sorts of unnecessary garbage. People should understand for themselves that if unsubstantiated and fabricated nasty things are written about you, for any reason, then this is most likely 99.9% lies.

That is, it will no longer be possible to say in court something like: "I have suffered moral harm and now I want a hundred-thousand-million in compensation."

However, there will be one thing, namely: for example, if the so-called moral harm was INTENTIONALLY caused, as something like - privacy of correspondence, medical confidentiality, etc. is violated. In general, this is exactly what can cause so-called "moral harm" but again, I repeat that this was done INTENTIONALLY to obviously cause so-called "moral harm," but it does not cause direct harm or violence.

In this case, if the victim of this moral harm causes mild to moderate damage to physical health (including damage to personal property) to the one who caused this "moral harm", then in court, the accused who initially suffered from "moral harm" and then committed the crime, depending on the situation itself, may receive notable leniency from the jury.

To the point that he may simply be released from custody. And yes, it is precisely such cases that are always considered by a jury.

But this point, we repeat, extends exclusively to the one who suffered and the one who caused these "moral harm" and then, not always and depending on the circumstances that the jury will determine for themselves - how much they are worth leniency and whether they are worth it at all.

That is, if the victim of "moral harm" brought his friends with him to punish the one who caused him "moral harm", then there will be no leniency towards his friends when they are caught and judged.

Subtle aspects of the new judiciary system

It is precisely because of this new judiciary scheme, for example, that it will be impossible to sue any propagandists from any mass media, because of whom families may have collapsed or relatives with opposite political points of view stopped communicating.

Someone might object and say, "Well, how is that?! It was because of them that all this happened, that they propagandized, instigated and pitted against each other." Yes it is, they are literally provokers. But why do people need brains? Are they biorobots?! No. Therefore, people must learn to think, find compromises and be able to negotiate, be able to criticize and think.

The propagandist is just provoking, yes, he is not a good person, he has chosen his destructive path, but in the end, he is just a provoker, he does not commit violence himself and does not directly cause harm. He will do it with your hands, but since you are not biorobots, your are thinking people, so you can come to reasonable conclusions yourself, that it is not necessary to listen to him and it is generally dangerous. And you need to criticize his every word, even if it is like a honey in the ears at first glance.

Social ostracism as one of the main elements of the new judiciary system

At the same time, nothing prevents you from not doing business with such a person with a well-known bad reputation as destructive mass media propagandist. Everyone will know him by sight, and someone won't rent him an apartment, someone won't serve him in a restaurant, and so on. And no one can do anything to such people, because it is their right not to respect a particular person.

In the same restaurant, for example, the manager will not get angry with the waiter, since he himself holds the opinion that this person does not belong here, and all the visitors will agree with them.

In this regard, in the new DSMN system, much will be built on the principle of respect. If a person engages in some kind of activity in such a way that society respects him, then it will be much easier for him to live in this society. And if a person engages in activities in such a way that society does not respect him, then it will be much more difficult for him to live in this society.

Sometimes social ostracism is worse than imprisonment. It will be very difficult for such people with a well-known bad reputation to live in a country based on the DSMN system where they cannot be tolerated and almost everyone in the society put grit in their bearings on all legal grounds. It will be easier for them to move to another country or sincerely repent to society and never engage in destructive activity again.

Main Page

2025-01-30T05:42:49Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* [[LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T05:40:56Z

Max9003:

What will the lawyers do in the DSMN system? Actually, all the same, they will search for evidence that the suspect did not commit what he is accused of. But they will do it without jural red tape. For example, the lawyer's request remains in force, which no one can ignore and which any organization must answer, the constant communication between the lawyer and his client, and the things like that.

The lawyer will be chosen by the suspect himself. The suspect will be provided with a lawyers list from which they will choose, in their opinion, the best and most accessible lawyer at the moment.

Lawyers are provided free of charge, supported by the budget and are required to respond immediately to a call to defend a suspect.

However, there is an exception here, if a lawyer already has at least one active case in which he is engaged, then he can refuse another parallel one. In total, a lawyer is allowed to handle no more than two cases at a time. This is done to not pursue quantity and by doing so sacrifice quality. So that there is no attitude on the part of lawyers like: "Anyway, I'll take 30 cases at once and will solve at least a couple of them and even doing all the cases half way, I'll definitely earn the money."

==Lawyer salary==

A lawyer receives an increase to the standard salary of his work in exactly the same amount if he has successfully proved the innocence of the suspect. For example, a lawyer receives 5,000 dollars per month of his standard salary, which he basically has in the service of the state. If he proves the suspect's innocence, he is paid another 5,000 dollars immediately after the charges against the suspect are dropped.

But in order to get an increase in his salary, it is up to the lawyer to find evidence justifying the suspect, and not so that the detective or operatives found out that the suspect was not involved in crime and released the suspect themselves, but the lawyer will receive his double salary. No, it won't work that way.

Thus, it is beneficial for all lawyers to engage in real investigations and receive extra money and higher rating for this, but at the same time, due to the limitation on the number of simultaneous cases (no more than two), a lawyer cannot deal with cases in a slipshod manner if he really wants to earn money.

By the way, the detective and his assistants can also receive an increase in their salary, just like the lawyer and in exactly the same amount, if they make the suspect talk with their persuasions. Of course any violence is excluded.

==The procedure of lawyer-client communication in custody==

A suspect can only be held in an holding cell of his own autonomy, there must also be an interrogation room where the detective (or operatives), as well as the lawyer and the suspect must be allowed at any time. Both in the holding cell and in the interrogation room, video surveillance is constantly conducted with recordings that are always available to second-order executives (Prosecutors) and third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomy. During the stay of the lawyer and the suspect in the interrogation room, the audio recording is turned off, which is confirmed by a special lamp placed above the door.

==Special training for lawyers==

Lawyers will be specially trained. They wil be trained for a relatively short time, since world of law in the form in which it has now will cease to exist, which means that a person with a lawyer's position will not be engaged in jural and bureaucratic nonsense, but in searching for real evidence of the innocence of suspects.

There will be no more nonsense when, due to an almost incorrectly placed comma, they could, due to the competent actions of a "lawyer", release a real fraudster who cheated millions and tens of millions people. Or vice versa, detain for a much longer or even indefinite period a some person who turned out to be innocent, but cannot file a complaint. Because he doesn't understand anything in this crazy jural subtle aspects, which means he agrees with his detention and allegedly doesn't protest.

==Training of a limited number of lawyers==

Since if there are too many lawyers, it is bad for the budget, and if there are not enough, then there is a heavy burden on the lawyers themselves, and it is not yet clear exactly how many they need for a comfortable life for lawyers and at the same time the rapid and effective realization of justice and fairness.

Thus, to begin with, we will adopt the standard that is currently present in some countries. According this standard an average city with a population of about 350,000 people will need about 210 lawyers.

I would like to emphasize that these are the most initial and approximate figures in order to build on something, i.e. in fact, there may be more in the future. Therefore, based on the above, the quotas for lawyers will be limited. In other words, it will be impossible to study for it and get a lawyer's certificate all the time.

==Anti-corruption protection==

If it turns out (with evidence) that there is collusion between the detective and the lawyer, then the cases they conducted will be reviewed. As a result, both of them will end up behind bars, and their close relatives will be banned from holding any executive positions and posts forever.

If there is no real evidence regarding the collusion, but there are doubts, then the lawyer and the detective can have their licenses (documents) taken away and deprived of the opportunity to engage in their activity with the wording "due to loss of trust."

Their licenses can be taken away by third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies in which they (lawyer and detective) are registered.

In the same way, we can revoke the license of one lawyer if it turns out that he is simply unscrupulous or slack working. The suspect (or his relatives) can complain to a second-order executive (Prosecutor) or a third-order executive (Judge) of his autonomy about his lawyer and explain the situation.

After that, a second-order executive (Prosecutor) or a third-order executive (Judge) contacts colleagues from the autonomy where the lawyer lives and comes to a conclusion about what to do with the lawyer against whom the complaint was received.

If suddenly a third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy in which the lawyer resides refuses to revoke his license without any arguments and, so to speak, cover him up and he has the right to do so. Then the third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the injured party resides also has the right to vote regarding the fate of the license of such a lawyer with the participation of three third-order executives (Judge) of the neighboring autonomies, but he must explain the whole situation to them as well.

The suspect, of course, chooses another lawyer for himself at the time of these proceedings.

LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-30T05:39:43Z

Max9003: Created page with "What will the lawyers do in the DSMN system? Actually, all the same, they will search for evidence that the suspect did not commit what he is accused of. But they will do it without jural red tape. For example, the lawyer's request remains in force, which no one can ignore and which any organization must answer, the constant communication between the lawyer and his client, and the things like that. The lawyer will be chosen by the suspect himself. The suspect will be pr..."

What will the lawyers do in the DSMN system? Actually, all the same, they will search for evidence that the suspect did not commit what he is accused of. But they will do it without jural red tape. For example, the lawyer's request remains in force, which no one can ignore and which any organization must answer, the constant communication between the lawyer and his client, and the things like that.

The lawyer will be chosen by the suspect himself. The suspect will be provided with a lawyers list from which they will choose, in their opinion, the best and most accessible lawyer at the moment.

Lawyers are provided free of charge, supported by the budget and are required to respond immediately to a call to defend a suspect.

However, there is an exception here, if a lawyer already has at least one active case in which he is engaged, then he can refuse another parallel one. In total, a lawyer is allowed to handle no more than two cases at a time. This is done to not pursue quantity and by doing so sacrifice quality. So that there is no attitude on the part of lawyers like: "Anyway, I'll take 30 cases at once and will solve at least a couple of them and even doing all the cases half way, I'll definitely earn the money."

Lawyer salary

A lawyer receives an increase to the standard salary of his work in exactly the same amount if he has successfully proved the innocence of the suspect. For example, a lawyer receives 5,000 dollars per month of his standard salary, which he basically has in the service of the state. If he proves the suspect's innocence, he is paid another 5,000 dollars immediately after the charges against the suspect are dropped.

But in order to get an increase in his salary, it is up to the lawyer to find evidence justifying the suspect, and not so that the detective or operatives found out that the suspect was not involved in crime and released the suspect themselves, but the lawyer will receive his double salary. No, it won't work that way.

Thus, it is beneficial for all lawyers to engage in real investigations and receive extra money and higher rating for this, but at the same time, due to the limitation on the number of simultaneous cases (no more than two), a lawyer cannot deal with cases in a slipshod manner if he really wants to earn money.

By the way, the detective and his assistants can also receive an increase in their salary, just like the lawyer and in exactly the same amount, if they make the suspect talk with their persuasions. Of course any violence is excluded.

The procedure of lawyer-client communication in custody

A suspect can only be held in an holding cell of his own autonomy, there must also be an interrogation room where the detective (or operatives), as well as the lawyer and the suspect must be allowed at any time. Both in the holding cell and in the interrogation room, video surveillance is constantly conducted with recordings that are always available to second-order executives (Prosecutors) and third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomy. During the stay of the lawyer and the suspect in the interrogation room, the audio recording is turned off, which is confirmed by a special lamp placed above the door.

Special training for lawyers

Lawyers will be specially trained. They wil be trained for a relatively short time, since world of law in the form in which it has now will cease to exist, which means that a person with a lawyer's position will not be engaged in jural and bureaucratic nonsense, but in searching for real evidence of the innocence of suspects.

There will be no more nonsense when, due to an almost incorrectly placed comma, they could, due to the competent actions of a "lawyer", release a real fraudster who cheated millions and tens of millions people. Or vice versa, detain for a much longer or even indefinite period a some person who turned out to be innocent, but cannot file a complaint. Because he doesn't understand anything in this crazy jural subtle aspects, which means he agrees with his detention and allegedly doesn't protest.

Training of a limited number of lawyers

Since if there are too many lawyers, it is bad for the budget, and if there are not enough, then there is a heavy burden on the lawyers themselves, and it is not yet clear exactly how many they need for a comfortable life for lawyers and at the same time the rapid and effective realization of justice and fairness.

Thus, to begin with, we will adopt the standard that is currently present in some countries. According this standard an average city with a population of about 350,000 people will need about 210 lawyers.

I would like to emphasize that these are the most initial and approximate figures in order to build on something, i.e. in fact, there may be more in the future. Therefore, based on the above, the quotas for lawyers will be limited. In other words, it will be impossible to study for it and get a lawyer's certificate all the time.

Anti-corruption protection

If it turns out (with evidence) that there is collusion between the detective and the lawyer, then the cases they conducted will be reviewed. As a result, both of them will end up behind bars, and their close relatives will be banned from holding any executive positions and posts forever.

If there is no real evidence regarding the collusion, but there are doubts, then the lawyer and the detective can have their licenses (documents) taken away and deprived of the opportunity to engage in their activity with the wording "due to loss of trust."

Their licenses can be taken away by third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies in which they (lawyer and detective) are registered.

In the same way, we can revoke the license of one lawyer if it turns out that he is simply unscrupulous or slack working. The suspect (or his relatives) can complain to a second-order executive (Prosecutor) or a third-order executive (Judge) of his autonomy about his lawyer and explain the situation.

After that, a second-order executive (Prosecutor) or a third-order executive (Judge) contacts colleagues from the autonomy where the lawyer lives and comes to a conclusion about what to do with the lawyer against whom the complaint was received.

If suddenly a third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy in which the lawyer resides refuses to revoke his license without any arguments and, so to speak, cover him up and he has the right to do so. Then the third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy where the injured party resides also has the right to vote regarding the fate of the license of such a lawyer with the participation of three third-order executives (Judge) of the neighboring autonomies, but he must explain the whole situation to them as well.

The suspect, of course, chooses another lawyer for himself at the time of these proceedings.

Main Page

2025-01-30T05:19:32Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* [[SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS]]
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS

2025-01-30T05:18:52Z

Max9003: Created page with "As for the courts dealing with economic lawsuits or arbitration courts in another way, we can conclude that based on well-known sources, there will be approximately 37,330 people for each arbitrator. Thus, it is possible to easily calculate number of arbitrators for all territorial entities. The councils of the region, province or state will choose the arbitrator. And the councils of the municipalities (city council, town council) will have the right to approve him and..."

As for the courts dealing with economic lawsuits or arbitration courts in another way, we can conclude that based on well-known sources, there will be approximately 37,330 people for each arbitrator. Thus, it is possible to easily calculate number of arbitrators for all territorial entities.

The councils of the region, province or state will choose the arbitrator. And the councils of the municipalities (city council, town council) will have the right to approve him and also have the opportunity to remove the arbitrator, including with disgrace. Moreover, when there is a vote for example in the city council on this issue, there should be at least 75% of the votes for the approval or removal of the arbitrator.

Yes, it is better to talk about regions, provinces or states here, rather than cities. The fact is that there are relatively few arbitrators themselves, the territorial entities are quite compact and not too long, not thousands of kilometers. And business interests can arise not only in cities and, accordingly, disagreements can also affect places anywhere in the region, province or state. Therefore, it is easier to leave the entire region, province or state to such arbitrators at once, the main thing is that there are enough of them and the burden on the arbitrators must be commensurate with their number.

However, in very large cities (such as Mumbai for example) or federally significant cities, it is better to make arbitration separate from the region, province or state.

For example, in Mumbai, judging by the above figures, approximately 359 arbitrators will be needed.

Since their number is insignificant for the country's budget, we can take an approximate number of arbitrators from the current standards per person, which are described above, and then look at the situation where it is better to add and where to reduce arbitration court quotas.

Main Page

2025-01-30T05:09:11Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES]]
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES

2025-01-30T05:08:46Z

Max9003: Created page with "If a new house, residential complex or other residential facilities are being built next to an autonomy, then such a construction is automatically attached to the nearest autonomy, with which it has the largest border. If the border is equal, then we flip a coin (joke). That is, even before the construction itself began, literally immediately after obtaining a construction permit, this territory will be annexed to the nearest autonomy in accordance with the conditions..."

If a new house, residential complex or other residential facilities are being built next to an autonomy, then such a construction is automatically attached to the nearest autonomy, with which it has the largest border. If the border is equal, then we flip a coin (joke).

That is, even before the construction itself began, literally immediately after obtaining a construction permit, this territory will be annexed to the nearest autonomy in accordance with the conditions described above. This means that local police from the nearest autonomy can now patrol there, and they are subject to the authority of a third-order executive (Judge). Well, that is, the territory of the autonomy has just temporarily grown during the construction.

Such a new territory remains in autonomy until its number is greater than or equal to 1,500 occupied apartments, that is with real 1,500 citizens living in these apartments.

After that, the alienation of this new territory begins and its transformation into its own autonomy, with its own police and other executives responsible for new autonomy.

Let's assume a situation where 1,500 new built apartments have already been purchased, but most of them were purchased by entrepreneurs for the purpose of renting out, and it seems like the apartments have already been bought, and the people who own them are living in other autonomies, but at the same time they get the opportunity to vote in the new (growing) autonomy.

In this case, entrepreneurs can give special permission to vote to those people who rent their apartment, choose executives and so on. However, this will be allowed only if the person who wants to rent an apartment rents it for at least a year.

Main Page

2025-01-29T17:05:07Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-29T17:04:39Z

Max9003: Created page with "During any official visits by ordinary people to executives or for example by a second-order executive (Prosecutor) to some executives or a third-order executive (Judge) or someone else (it doesn't matter) with any appeals, the executive who receives guests in his office is obliged to press a special button next to the light switch before entering people into his office. This button starts clear video and audio recordings of what is happening in the office, that is, the..."

During any official visits by ordinary people to executives or for example by a second-order executive (Prosecutor) to some executives or a third-order executive (Judge) or someone else (it doesn't matter) with any appeals, the executive who receives guests in his office is obliged to press a special button next to the light switch before entering people into his office. This button starts clear video and audio recordings of what is happening in the office, that is, the actual conversation itself.

At the same time, a red light comes on over the office of such an executive, this is evidence that there is a reception of citizens or an official consultation between executives or something else. This is very strict and mandatory. The video and audio recording is automatically sent to all second-order executives (Prosecutors) of the autonomy.

It would be possible to do it with papers with seals and protocols and other statements, but it seems the 21st century has arrived. So why all this paperwork?! But in case of a power cut, as well as in those places of the Earth where modern technologies are not yet available, paper forms with applications will be always provided and all seals should be on every executive's desk and ready in such cases.

Anyway backup power should be provided in all executive offices, or if there is such a technical and not too expensive option, a separate electric power line unrelated to the rest buildings of autonomy, which should always be turned on at all costs.

Main Page

2025-01-29T17:01:22Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* [[THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-29T16:59:49Z

Max9003:

==Main structure==

The police will always be elected from within the autonomies themselves and there will also be a special police office. The recommended number of police officers per autonomy is 8 people (4 people per shift) with about 19 houses in the territory under their control, each of which is supposed to have about 288 apartments (5,472 apartments in total). There are up to 3,000 residents per district police officer.

==Police duty==

Police officers are on duty in groups of 4 people, then the next group replaces the previous one. The format of the duty will be decided by the police themselves. For example, the shifts may be the following - 2 nights after 2 nights or some at night, others during the day and so on. This will need to be analyzed in more detail.

The first in the group is always the police commander, he is elected by a third-order executive (Judge), then he chooses a group from the territory under his control - he invites those people from the autonomy who wish to be in the same team with him under his command.

Police officers can act as they please to protect citizens, the only ones they have to answer to are those who elected them - third-order executives (Judges), as well as second-order executives (Prosecutors) on whose territory they are located.

==Protection from police abuse==

Such police officers are very easy to control, because they literally take the fall by the third-order executives (Judges), who are as close as possible to ordinary people, who in turn can very quickly come to these third-order executives (Judges) and ask them for possible police outrages.

And if the third-order executives (Judges) do nothing, they will be replaced by the residents themselves in one swoop. Therefore, despite the almost unlimited power on their territory, the police need to be more careful in their actions towards people. Thus, they will be compliant and adequate despite the power they have, as everyone understands that it is very easy to replace them or even kick them out and get blacklisted.

==Reinforcements for problematic autonomies and operation of police offices==

If the situation in an autonomy is too serious and there is a shortage of police personnel, then it is easy to call for help from other urban autonomies, where the situation is calm and there are enough people to help colleagues.

Police officers from other autonomies are required to react if everything is calm with them. There is a special button in each police office that is pressed when all police officers are on the move and the office is closed. When this button is pressed, communication with this police office is turned off automatically, since there is no one to call for help from there anyway.

And when this button is pressed, a red lamp lights up on the police office itself, which is visible to everyone on the street. This way, if residents suspect that the police officers are just beating the cover in the police office. That is, all residents walking by police office see its open and someone is clearly sitting there (all police offices will have large windows and any resident can always see who is and who is not there) and pressed a button just so that they are not called, then people can immediately complain about them to third-order executive (Judge) or second-order executive (Prosecutor) and they will take measures. Since with the red lamp on, the police officers all have to leave their office and thereby show to everyone walking by the police office that they are in the field.

When someone trying to make a call to police office, a green light comes on at the police office, and since the windows of the office are large and we can see what's going on inside, everyone can see that the police are not ignoring the call and are responding to it.

If a person is calling to the police office, but all the police officers on his autonomy are in the field, then the calling people are redirected to the nearest available police officers from nearby autonomies.

All calls, their exact date, dial-up attempts and to which police office and which autonomy they were made are automatically recorded. All these records are automatically sent to second-order executives (Prosecutors). Therefore, once a person failed to reach police office by phone, he can easily proceed to the appropriate executive and together they can listen to the call itself or his dial-up attempt and immediately establish whether the police personnel were on the spot at the time of the call and in which police office it was. And of course if they need to, view the video surveillance cameras in this very police office at that moment.

==Controlling the police==

By the way, the second-order executive (Prosecutor) receives a salary bonus for every obvious violation found, so this is always in his interests.

After the violations are found, the second-order executive (Prosecutor) turns to the third-order executive (Judge) and he resolves the issue with the police.

A third-order executive (Judge) can easily dismiss any policeman, but only if 50% or more of the residents of the autonomy agree with this. Dismissal occurs within a week, if during the week, people of the autonomy do not show dissatisfaction with at least 50% of their total number, then the policeman (police officers) will not be dismissed. Dissatisfaction can always be expressed in such a way that during this week, people can come to the executives office and, having presented their passport, leave a note that they are against the decision of a third-order executive (Judge) to dismiss a policeman.

==Police adjutant and various types of emergencies==

The third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy, as most important manager of the autonomy, decides how many police officers can be allocated to some event in the city (holidays, concerts, festivals, live shows etc.) to ensure public order there. In this case, the police come under the direct command of a special executive - police adjutant (or something like that), that is, the interim chief of police.

That is, this executive (police adjutant) receives police officers at his disposal, who are obliged to comply with all his decrees until the third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies take police officers back to their territory. The police adjutant is elected by the council of the municipality (city, town, village, etc.), with a majority of their votes (at least 60%).

Also, the police adjutant promptly receives full authority and police officers from the city council and third-order executives (Judges), respectively, during the elimination of various types of emergencies (fires, floods, man-made and natural disasters and so on), in order to deal with the situation promptly, without any bureaucratic muddle.

From the police officers who have arrived to serve with police adjutant, he quickly chooses his assistants and promptly builds a strictly subordinate vertical of power and begins to act by giving orders that the police officers are obliged to strictly follow.

Those police officers who come to his service and who will not take his orders seriously, goofing off or even refuse to obey the orders, may be put behind bars for the duration of his command. Then, third-order executives (Judges) who are the direct superiors of these police officers, as well as second-order executives (Prosecutors) from the autonomy where these police officers came from will receive a report on their charges and will deal with them themselves.

The police adjutant after the liquidation of the of emergency situations - transfers power back. Police adjutants are thoroughly trained, as the safety of citizens in special cases depends on their activities.

Police adjutants are always in touch with the city council. The decision on whether to end the state of emergency is decided by the city council. Thus, the police adjutant cannot independently hold power in this mode that is, he is also controlled, and the city council continues to be controlled by a lower level of executives and can be re-elected even in emergency situations.

If it is already clear to everyone that the state of emergency has definitely ended, but for some reason the city council do not want to cancel it and are in collusion with the police adjutant, thus trying to seize power, in this case lower level executives could terminate the power of the city council. That is, power grab is also impossible.

If the police adjutant does not have enough people to eliminate emergencies, he can always request help from the army.

In fact, a third-order executive (Judge) manages the police on his territory (autonomy), and also informs his police officers about wanted violators by transmitting them videofits, police suspect sketches for example, and so on.

THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-29T16:58:23Z

Max9003: Created page with "Main structure The police will always be elected from within the autonomies themselves and there will also be a special police office. The recommended number of police officers per autonomy is 8 people (4 people per shift) with about 19 houses in the territory under their control, each of which is supposed to have about 288 apartments (5,472 apartments in total). There are up to 3,000 residents per district police officer. Police duty Police officers are on duty in gr..."

Main structure

The police will always be elected from within the autonomies themselves and there will also be a special police office. The recommended number of police officers per autonomy is 8 people (4 people per shift) with about 19 houses in the territory under their control, each of which is supposed to have about 288 apartments (5,472 apartments in total). There are up to 3,000 residents per district police officer.

Police duty

Police officers are on duty in groups of 4 people, then the next group replaces the previous one. The format of the duty will be decided by the police themselves. For example, the shifts may be the following - 2 nights after 2 nights or some at night, others during the day and so on. This will need to be analyzed in more detail.

The first in the group is always the police commander, he is elected by a third-order executive (Judge), then he chooses a group from the territory under his control - he invites those people from the autonomy who wish to be in the same team with him under his command.

Police officers can act as they please to protect citizens, the only ones they have to answer to are those who elected them - third-order executives (Judges), as well as second-order executives (Prosecutors) on whose territory they are located.

Protection from police abuse

Such police officers are very easy to control, because they literally take the fall by the third-order executives (Judges), who are as close as possible to ordinary people, who in turn can very quickly come to these third-order executives (Judges) and ask them for possible police outrages.

And if the third-order executives (Judges) do nothing, they will be replaced by the residents themselves in one swoop. Therefore, despite the almost unlimited power on their territory, the police need to be more careful in their actions towards people. Thus, they will be compliant and adequate despite the power they have, as everyone understands that it is very easy to replace them or even kick them out and get blacklisted.

Reinforcements for problematic autonomies and operation of police offices

If the situation in an autonomy is too serious and there is a shortage of police personnel, then it is easy to call for help from other urban autonomies, where the situation is calm and there are enough people to help colleagues.

Police officers from other autonomies are required to react if everything is calm with them. There is a special button in each police office that is pressed when all police officers are on the move and the office is closed. When this button is pressed, communication with this police office is turned off automatically, since there is no one to call for help from there anyway.

And when this button is pressed, a red lamp lights up on the police office itself, which is visible to everyone on the street. This way, if residents suspect that the police officers are just beating the cover in the police office. That is, all residents walking by police office see its open and someone is clearly sitting there (all police offices will have large windows and any resident can always see who is and who is not there) and pressed a button just so that they are not called, then people can immediately complain about them to third-order executive (Judge) or second-order executive (Prosecutor) and they will take measures. Since with the red lamp on, the police officers all have to leave their office and thereby show to everyone walking by the police office that they are in the field.

When someone trying to make a call to police office, a green light comes on at the police office, and since the windows of the office are large and we can see what's going on inside, everyone can see that the police are not ignoring the call and are responding to it.

If a person is calling to the police office, but all the police officers on his autonomy are in the field, then the calling people are redirected to the nearest available police officers from nearby autonomies.

All calls, their exact date, dial-up attempts and to which police office and which autonomy they were made are automatically recorded. All these records are automatically sent to second-order executives (Prosecutors). Therefore, once a person failed to reach police office by phone, he can easily proceed to the appropriate executive and together they can listen to the call itself or his dial-up attempt and immediately establish whether the police personnel were on the spot at the time of the call and in which police office it was. And of course if they need to, view the video surveillance cameras in this very police office at that moment.

Controlling the police

By the way, the second-order executive (Prosecutor) receives a salary bonus for every obvious violation found, so this is always in his interests.

After the violations are found, the second-order executive (Prosecutor) turns to the third-order executive (Judge) and he resolves the issue with the police.

A third-order executive (Judge) can easily dismiss any policeman, but only if 50% or more of the residents of the autonomy agree with this. Dismissal occurs within a week, if during the week, people of the autonomy do not show dissatisfaction with at least 50% of their total number, then the policeman (police officers) will not be dismissed. Dissatisfaction can always be expressed in such a way that during this week, people can come to the executives office and, having presented their passport, leave a note that they are against the decision of a third-order executive (Judge) to dismiss a policeman.

Police adjutant and various types of emergencies

The third-order executive (Judge) of the autonomy, as most important manager of the autonomy, decides how many police officers can be allocated to some event in the city (holidays, concerts, festivals, live shows etc.) to ensure public order there. In this case, the police come under the direct command of a special executive - police adjutant (or something like that), that is, the interim chief of police.

That is, this executive (police adjutant) receives police officers at his disposal, who are obliged to comply with all his decrees until the third-order executives (Judges) of the autonomies take police officers back to their territory. The police adjutant is elected by the council of the municipality (city, town, village, etc.), with a majority of their votes (at least 60%).

Also, the police adjutant promptly receives full authority and police officers from the city council and third-order executives (Judges), respectively, during the elimination of various types of emergencies (fires, floods, man-made and natural disasters and so on), in order to deal with the situation promptly, without any bureaucratic muddle.

From the police officers who have arrived to serve with police adjutant, he quickly chooses his assistants and promptly builds a strictly subordinate vertical of power and begins to act by giving orders that the police officers are obliged to strictly follow.

Those police officers who come to his service and who will not take his orders seriously, goofing off or even refuse to obey the orders, may be put behind bars for the duration of his command. Then, third-order executives (Judges) who are the direct superiors of these police officers, as well as second-order executives (Prosecutors) from the autonomy where these police officers came from will receive a report on their charges and will deal with them themselves.

The police adjutant after the liquidation of the of emergency situations - transfers power back. Police adjutants are thoroughly trained, as the safety of citizens in special cases depends on their activities.

Police adjutants are always in touch with the city council. The decision on whether to end the state of emergency is decided by the city council. Thus, the police adjutant cannot independently hold power in this mode that is, he is also controlled, and the city council continues to be controlled by a lower level of executives and can be re-elected even in emergency situations.

If it is already clear to everyone that the state of emergency has definitely ended, but for some reason the city council do not want to cancel it and are in collusion with the police adjutant, thus trying to seize power, in this case lower level executives could terminate the power of the city council. That is, power grab is also impossible.

If the police adjutant does not have enough people to eliminate emergencies, he can always request help from the army.

In fact, a third-order executive (Judge) manages the police on his territory (autonomy), and also informs his police officers about wanted violators by transmitting them videofits, police suspect sketches for example, and so on.

Main Page

2025-01-29T16:37:37Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* [[DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM]]
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-29T16:36:46Z

Max9003:

Based on the number of crimes, approximately 330 detectives per city are needed in Magdeburg (Germany). For example Mumbai (India) needs approximately 21,000 detectives per city. This includes 2 assistants for each detective. The number of detectives is taken from the calculation rate of 13 cases per month per detective. The norm is considered to be no more than 9-13 cases per month per detective.

From the calculations of the indicators above, the detectives standard will be adopted, which is very flexible and can easily change due to the crime rate of the territory, which is about 1/6 of 1% of the inhabitants of the populated territory.

In fact, to tell exactly how many detectives we need and therefore save money on it without harming residents, we need to know the number of crimes committed per month and year give or take in the respective territories and constantly monitor this parameter.

Detectives are dealing with all possible crimes, both domestic and economic. A third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor) gives a task to the detective if the culprit is unknown and it is required to identify and search for or track down a known suspect and establish his involvement in the crime, presenting 100% evidence in the end.

==Anti-corruption protection==

Detectives for all types of detective and other investigative measures (including surveillance) must be selected in such a way that one detective is from the affected area, that is, in the case itself must be at least two detectives: 1st for a conditionally affected territory and 2nd for an independent territory, for minimal corruption.

A detective who is selected from an independent territory of a city, region, etc. is good at least because it excludes the possibility of bribing him in advance for so called planned crimes. Also, detectives and their assistants are usually not familiar with each other and generally speaking they will only communicate on a case in which they were coordinated by a third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor), which means collusion between them is less likely and they will control each other investigating the case rather than risk to commit a crime.

But for the detection of obvious forgeries with the provision of evidence, they will be given substantial benefits and bonuses for a year. But for a crime, respectively, they will be given a significant punishment, which will affect, among other things, the next of kin, who will no longer be employed in government executive positions, never and under no circumstances. This will generally be a common practice regarding others government executives.

There are no restrictions on the number of detectives per case. First of all, those who are less busy and especially willing are chosen, since with a quick and competent investigation, with all 100% evidence, they will receive a bonus in the amount of their salary for the solved case.

Of course, more detectives and their assistants will be required in cases where there are many criminal episodes and where many people will be needed to sort them out.

DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

2025-01-29T16:36:27Z

Max9003: Created page with "Based on the number of crimes, approximately 330 detectives per city are needed in Magdeburg (Germany). For example Mumbai (India) needs approximately 21,000 detectives per city. This includes 2 assistants for each detective. The number of detectives is taken from the calculation rate of 13 cases per month per detective. The norm is considered to be no more than 9-13 cases per month per detective. From the calculations of the indicators above, the detectives standard wi..."

Based on the number of crimes, approximately 330 detectives per city are needed in Magdeburg (Germany). For example Mumbai (India) needs approximately 21,000 detectives per city. This includes 2 assistants for each detective. The number of detectives is taken from the calculation rate of 13 cases per month per detective. The norm is considered to be no more than 9-13 cases per month per detective.

From the calculations of the indicators above, the detectives standard will be adopted, which is very flexible and can easily change due to the crime rate of the territory, which is about 1/6 of 1% of the inhabitants of the populated territory.

In fact, to tell exactly how many detectives we need and therefore save money on it without harming residents, we need to know the number of crimes committed per month and year give or take in the respective territories and constantly monitor this parameter.

Detectives are dealing with all possible crimes, both domestic and economic. A third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor) gives a task to the detective if the culprit is unknown and it is required to identify and search for or track down a known suspect and establish his involvement in the crime, presenting 100% evidence in the end.

Anti-corruption protection

Detectives for all types of detective and other investigative measures (including surveillance) must be selected in such a way that one detective is from the affected area, that is, in the case itself must be at least two detectives: 1st for a conditionally affected territory and 2nd for an independent territory, for minimal corruption.

A detective who is selected from an independent territory of a city, region, etc. is good at least because it excludes the possibility of bribing him in advance for so called planned crimes. Also, detectives and their assistants are usually not familiar with each other and generally speaking they will only communicate on a case in which they were coordinated by a third-order executive (Judge) or a second-order executive (Prosecutor), which means collusion between them is less likely and they will control each other investigating the case rather than risk to commit a crime.

But for the detection of obvious forgeries with the provision of evidence, they will be given substantial benefits and bonuses for a year. But for a crime, respectively, they will be given a significant punishment, which will affect, among other things, the next of kin, who will no longer be employed in government executive positions, never and under no circumstances. This will generally be a common practice regarding others government executives.

There are no restrictions on the number of detectives per case. First of all, those who are less busy and especially willing are chosen, since with a quick and competent investigation, with all 100% evidence, they will receive a bonus in the amount of their salary for the solved case.

Of course, more detectives and their assistants will be required in cases where there are many criminal episodes and where many people will be needed to sort them out.

HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY

2025-01-29T01:24:04Z

Max9003:

What we are offering is not an ideal model, following which it is supposedly possible to structure the whole world for the best. No, it is not. We only offer a basic matrix that indicates the political and social management vector, because there are many subtle aspects and details in different countries where DSMN system cannot be implemented out of the blue.

For example, there are some problematic countries in the world. In these countries, the level of consciousness of some people living on some territories of these countries is so low that it requires the harsh dictatorial fullness of power of a single person who will closely monitor not only the construction of this new DSMN system, but also the development of consciousness of the people themselves and this is literally the cultivation of a new generations of people in isolation from the old unhealthy traditions of their parents, who have long believed that the way they live is normal.

And this, in turn, means that when building a new political and management paradigm, competently trained teachers, educators, psychologists, etc are needed. And it won't even take a year or two, but most likely a whole generation, before such a DSMN system can be implemented actively and without any problems.

Without this, by simply giving the system with all its descriptions and matrix keys to people who are not ready to build a wise society and even giving the means with which it could be built, all this, unfortunately, will come down to civil and clan wars and other criminal actions and the money just will be stolen.

Someone who doesn't understand the real things in the world will mention some kind of intolerance here, but unfortunately these are just facts and you need to know them and understand how to deal with them.

Again, someone will be outraged and they say why should all this be done by one person, but what about, for example, the council or at least create a supervisory committee? After all, one person with unlimited power will simply take power into his own hands and will not give it back, then we will have a sad demise.

Yes, it will be, but only on condition that this person is just the flesh of the unprepared society flesh to which you would like to present this new political and management paradigm, and as we said above, this is not an intolerance, these are facts.

Main Page

2025-01-29T01:18:34Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* [[HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY]]
* DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY

2025-01-29T01:17:36Z

Max9003: Created page with "What we are offering is not an ideal model, following which it is supposedly possible to structure the whole world for the best. No, it is not. We only offer a basic matrix that indicates the political and social management vector, because there are many subtle aspects and details in different countries where DSMN system cannot be implemented out of the blue. For example, there are some problematic countries in th world. In these countries, the level of consciousness of..."

What we are offering is not an ideal model, following which it is supposedly possible to structure the whole world for the best. No, it is not. We only offer a basic matrix that indicates the political and social management vector, because there are many subtle aspects and details in different countries where DSMN system cannot be implemented out of the blue.

For example, there are some problematic countries in th world. In these countries, the level of consciousness of some people living on some territories of these countries is so low that it requires the harsh dictatorial fullness of power of a single person who will closely monitor not only the construction of this new DSMN system, but also the development of consciousness of the people themselves and this is literally the cultivation of a new generations of people in isolation from the old unhealthy traditions of their parents, who have long believed that the way they live is normal.

And this, in turn, means that when building a new political and management paradigm, competently trained teachers, educators, psychologists, etc are needed. And it won't even take a year or two, but most likely a whole generation, before such a DSMN system can be implemented actively and without any problems.

Without this, by simply giving the system with all its descriptions and matrix keys to people who are not ready to build a wise society and even giving the means with which it could be built, all this, unfortunately, will come down to civil and clan wars and other criminal actions and the money just will be stolen.

Someone who doesn't understand the real things in the world will mention some kind of intolerance here, but unfortunately these are just facts and you need to know them and understand how to deal with them.

Again, someone will be outraged and they say why should all this be done by one person, but what about, for example, the council or at least create a supervisory committee? After all, one person with unlimited power will simply take power into his own hands and will not give it back, then we will have a sad demise.

Yes, it will be, but only on condition that this person is just the flesh of the unprepared society flesh to which you would like to present this new political and management paradigm, and as we said above, this is not an intolerance, these are facts.

Main Page

2025-01-29T01:08:18Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES]]
* HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY
* DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES

2025-01-29T01:07:51Z

Max9003: Created page with "'''Question:''' how will such a DSMN system be funded, if it is possibly implemented, for example, in one or more regions, states, provinces of the country? '''Answer:''' executives, starting with first-order executives, submit financial documents to their higher-ranking colleagues, with seals and signatures, respectively. So, one by one, the ranks of executives collect information related to finances in the territory entrusted to them and bring it to the top of the ter..."

'''Question:''' how will such a DSMN system be funded, if it is possibly implemented, for example, in one or more regions, states, provinces of the country?

'''Answer:''' executives, starting with first-order executives, submit financial documents to their higher-ranking colleagues, with seals and signatures, respectively. So, one by one, the ranks of executives collect information related to finances in the territory entrusted to them and bring it to the top of the territorial entity, that is, the governor (Coordinator of the region, province or state).

Next, the governor (Coordinator of the region, province or state) - he submits these documents with his seals and signatures to the Ministry of Finance of the country, demanding the announced amount for the next year.

Moreover, the salaries of the all executives is the 1st budget item, the needs of the territorial entity is the 2nd budget item, as well as financial documents regarding the development of the territorial entity is the 3rd budget item are submitted separately. That is, we get a kind of three budget items of the territorial entity, the real possibility of which the Ministry of Finance of the country will consider.

At the stage of implementing DSMN system in some regions, provinces or states it should be understood that some regions, provinces or states may well provide for themselves and even be donors to other regions, provinces or states, while some, on the contrary, will not be able to do without support from the central government (in such regions, provinces or states at least the first two budget items must be fulfilled).

In the future, when the country will governed entirely by a DSMN system, all the money raised by taxes and excises from all territorial entities will always be thrown into a common pool, from which the first two budget items will be mandatory, and the possibility of implementing the 3rd budget item will be reviewed by the Council of the Ministry of Finance and implemented depending on the monetary capabilities of the country to date - immediately or gradually, may be it will be stretched over time or even rejected until better times.

Moreover, at the stage of gradual implementation and formation of a DSMN system in some country, the existing country's leadership elected by standard democratic ways, which controls the establishment and running-in of a new DSMN system in its country, gradually achieves such financial indicators within these autonomies so that they become self-sufficient in order to stop financing them from the central government. So that already at the stage of gradual implementation of the DSMN system throughout the country, they would have their own Ministry of Finance and their own common pool, which will be separate from the rest of the country.

However, the country still secures these autonomies in case of unforeseen situations and is always ready to help financially if necessary. We could consider this situation like a parent who holds a child when he takes the first steps so that he does not fall, but at the same time parent does not hold too much so that the child learns to keep his balance himself. And parent holds a child only at a really critical moment, when the child is already obviously falling to the ground.

Main Page

2025-01-29T01:02:08Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* [[A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES
* HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY
* DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES

2025-01-29T01:01:49Z

Max9003: Created page with "Within the governed territory (autonomy), an executive office is organized - that is, a building with rooms for executives of all orders and their assistants is being built or organized."

Within the governed territory (autonomy), an executive office is organized - that is, a building with rooms for executives of all orders and their assistants is being built or organized.

Main Page

2025-01-29T01:00:06Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* [[BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES]]
* A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES
* THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES
* HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY
* DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM

BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES

2025-01-29T00:59:22Z

Max9003: Created page with "For a first-order executives, the salary increases by 5% of the initial one, for every new builded 300 apartments. This opportunity is given if it could be more convenient for the city. The Mayors of the districts with the additional consent of the third-order executive (Judge + Governor) of the autonomy decide whether it is worth it or not and in which autonomy under their control it can be involved. It is also necessary to take into account the urban structure and me..."

For a first-order executives, the salary increases by 5% of the initial one, for every new builded 300 apartments. This opportunity is given if it could be more convenient for the city. The Mayors of the districts with the additional consent of the third-order executive (Judge + Governor) of the autonomy decide whether it is worth it or not and in which autonomy under their control it can be involved.

It is also necessary to take into account the urban structure and mentality of residents, if we are talking about other countries. This is a variable that can change depending on the situation, for example, it may not be new 300 apartments, but 150 or 100 or 90 and so on. This option is individual for each specific case.

Main Page

2025-01-29T00:56:07Z

Max9003: /* All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA */

==== Dear friends! This Wiki is entirely dedicated to the knowledge data base of decentralized social (state) management network SVARGA. Here you can find out in detail how the DSMN SVARGA works and how it organized. ====

== All point by point information about the structure and operation of the DSMN SVARGA ==
* [[THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE SYSTEM]]
* [[THIRD-ORDER EXECUTIVES OR JUDGES]]
* [[VOTING]]
* [[THE VOTING PROCESS]]
* BONUSES FOR EXECUTIVES
* A COMMON OFFICE FOR EXECUTIVES
* THE SYSTEM OF FINANCING AUTONOMIES
* HOW DOES THE DSMN SYSTEM WORK IN A TOWN, VILLAGE OR RURAL COMMUNITY
* DETECTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE POLICE IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION WITH EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REAL ESTATE OBJECTS IN AUTONOMIES
* SPECIAL COURTS DEALING WITH ECONOMIC LAWSUITS
* LAWYERS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* RELOCATION OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* JURY IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MASS MEDIA AND MONITORING THE WORK OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* CRIMES AND LAW VIOLATIONS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* TRIALS IN RELATION TO ENTREPRENEURS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* REGULATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVES IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM
* MARKETS, FARMER'S SQUARES AND FAIRS IN THE NEW DSMN SYSTEM